Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants made out a prima facie case for unconditional stay on the claim of exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. and on the plea of limitation.
Analysis: The imported goods were claimed to fall within the exemption scheme for goods required for setting up, running, repairing, or maintaining a crude petroleum refinery. The notification was read harmoniously so that the specific entry for accessories and replacement items was not rendered ineffective. On limitation, the bill of entry disclosed the nature and intended use of the goods, and the subsequent show cause notice was issued beyond the normal period. On these facts, invocation of the extended period was not justified at the stay stage.
Conclusion: The appellants established a prima facie case on merits and limitation, and unconditional stay was granted in their favour.