Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of central excise duty and penalties could be sustained when the goods manufactured were held to be classifiable under Chapter 39 and covered by the relevant exemption notifications, and whether the allegation of dummy units survived in that situation.
Analysis: The goods in question were HDPE tapes, fabrics and sacks. The Tribunal noted that the department had treated the goods as falling under Chapters 54 and 59, but the judicial view already taken was that such goods were classifiable under Chapter 39. On that footing, the goods were covered by the applicable exemption notifications for the relevant period, with the result that no duty was payable. Once the goods themselves were found exempt from duty, the foundation of the allegation that the appellant had floated dummy units to avail an inadmissible SSI benefit ceased to have significance.
Conclusion: The duty demand and the penalties were not sustainable and were set aside in favour of the assessee.