Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty in a case involving recovery of central excise dues from the purchaser of an industrial unit after purchase of the unit.
Analysis: The unit had been purchased on 22-05-2003. At that time, the Tribunal found that no provision parallel to Rule 230 of the Central Excise Rules existed in the Central Excise Act or the Rules to fasten liability on the purchaser. The applicant therefore showed a strong prima facie case against recovery of the duty and equal penalty demanded.
Conclusion: Waiver of the entire pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted and the stay petition was allowed.