Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 23/98-Cus. dated 01-03-1998 was available on the basis of the Chartered Accountant's certificate and verified invoices showing sale of imported material to actual users in the leather industry.
Analysis: The original adjudicating authority had accepted the Chartered Accountant's certificate after verifying it with the invoices and found the certificate genuine. The appellate authority's doubt about the certificate was not supported by the factual record and rested on conjectures and surmises. The record indicated that the imported material had been sold to actual users in the leather industry, and the order of the original authority was found to be on a sounder footing in law and on facts for the purposes of the notification.
Conclusion: The benefit of the notification was held to be available, and the assessee's case was accepted.