Appeal dismissed for refund of additional customs duty on re-imported goods. The appeal by Shri Chittaranjan Satapathy was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai as there was no legal provision for refunding additional ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal dismissed for refund of additional customs duty on re-imported goods.
The appeal by Shri Chittaranjan Satapathy was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai as there was no legal provision for refunding additional customs duty on re-imported goods cleared for home consumption. The appeal was dismissed due to the lack of a claim for refund of excise duty.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the appeal by Shri Chittaranjan Satapathy as there was no legal provision to refund additional customs duty on re-imported goods cleared for home consumption. The appeal was dismissed as the excise duty was not claimed for refund.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.