Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the two medicaments were classifiable as patent and proprietary medicines under Heading 3003.10 or as generic medicines under Heading 3003.20 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act.
Analysis: The classification turned on the manner in which the products were presented on the labels. One product prominently displayed the house name and patented name "Obroquin", which supported classification as a patent and proprietary medicine. The other product did not carry any house name, and only the generic name was shown prominently, supporting treatment as a generic medicine. The mere presence of the generic name on the label did not, by itself, displace the significance of the conspicuous house name on the first product.
Conclusion: The product Obroquin was held classifiable under Heading 3003.10, while Chloroquine Phosphate Injection was held classifiable under Heading 3003.20. The appeal succeeded only in part.