Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of duty and penalty on a prima facie showing that the National Calamity Contingent Duty was not leviable on the exempted goods.
Analysis: The order noted that sub-clause (3) of Clause 129 of the Finance Bill, 2001-2002 provided for application of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the rules made thereunder, including exemptions and refunds, to the levy and collection of National Calamity Contingent Duty on the specified goods. It also recorded that the appellants were clearing goods to a United Nations funded project and had been treated as exempt under the relevant notification. Relying on the earlier Tribunal and Supreme Court authorities, the order held that the appellants had made out a strong prima facie case on merits.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal.