TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue had made out a case for stay of the order granting exemption benefit under Notification No. 115/75-C.E. to the respondent's products.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the respondent's unit was a composite oil mill and supported by a certificate from the concerned authority. On the materials placed, the Tribunal found that the Commissioner's view granting exemption appeared prima facie correct because the notification extended benefit to products manufactured by such an industry. The Tribunal held that the Revenue had not shown merit for stay at that stage.
Conclusion: The stay application was rejected.
TaxTMI 
