CESTAT grants refund for duty on destroyed goods due to fire accident

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore allowed the appeal for a refund claim of duty paid on goods destroyed in a fire accident. Relying on the precedent in Winsome Yarn Ltd. case, the Tribunal held that remission of duty for goods destroyed in a fire accident is warranted under the Customs Act. The Tribunal found the rejection of the refund claim by the authorities unjustified, setting aside the order and granting the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Refund claim for duty paid on goods destroyed in fire accident.

In the judgment delivered by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, the appeal arose from the rejection of a refund claim by the Commissioner (Appeals) in OIA No. 64/2001-C.E. The appellants sought remission of duty for goods burnt in a fire accident in their factory, which was denied by both authorities. The appellants relied on a Tribunal ruling in Winsome Yarn Ltd. v. CCE, Chandigarh, which held that remission of duty is warranted for goods destroyed in a fire accident under relevant sections of the Customs Act.

Upon hearing the learned DR, the Tribunal found the claim for refund of duty paid on goods destroyed in a fire accident to be justified and legitimate under the Customs Act. Citing the precedent set in Winsome Yarn Ltd., the Tribunal declared that remission of duty for goods destroyed in fire is admissible. The appellants had promptly deposited the duty upon the goods' destruction and subsequently claimed a refund. The Tribunal deemed the authorities' rejection of the refund claim as unjustified and set aside the order, allowing the appeal. The operative part of the order was pronounced in open court at the conclusion of the hearing.

---