Appellate Tribunal grants duty waiver to Suprati Plastic Ltd. for manufacturing activities in EOU license

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Suprati Plastic Ltd., determining that the operations conducted on the raw materials in the EOU license constituted manufacturing activity. The Tribunal granted a waiver of duty and penalties, pending appeals, based on the broader interpretation of manufacturing activities in an EOU and the emergence of a new commercially identifiable product.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether the operations conducted by the appellant on the raw materials in the EOU license constitute manufacturing activity.
2. Whether the appellant is liable to pay duties and penalties for the operations conducted on the raw materials.

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The core issue in this case before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai was whether the operations conducted by the appellant on the raw materials in the EOU license granted to them constituted manufacturing activity. The appellant, M/s. Suprati Plastic Ltd., had procured Ascorbic Acid IP/BP grade and subjected it to a process of coating with permitted chemicals. The Commissioner relied on test reports from M/s. ITALAB, Mumbai, which showed a change in the percentage of ascorbic acid and that the product removed did not meet the export quality standards. Additionally, a certificate from Professor K.G. Akamanchi stated that the process resulted in a new commercially identifiable product. The Tribunal, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Laminated Packings Ltd., concluded that a new product emerged commercially, constituting manufacturing under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

Issue 2:
Regarding the liability of the appellant to pay duties and penalties for the operations conducted on the raw materials, the Tribunal considered the definition of 'manufacture' under the Exim Policy, which encompassed activities beyond the normal scope of Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal highlighted previous decisions indicating that manufacturing activities in an EOU are broader in scope. Consequently, the Tribunal found no prima facie case to support the Revenue's contention that no manufacturing activity occurred on the Ascorbic Acid processed by the appellant. As a result, the Tribunal granted a full waiver of duty and penalties under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, and stayed the recovery pending appeals.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Suprati Plastic Ltd., determining that the operations conducted on the raw materials in the EOU license constituted manufacturing activity. The Tribunal granted a waiver of duty and penalties, pending appeals, based on the broader interpretation of manufacturing activities in an EOU and the emergence of a new commercially identifiable product.

---