Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2004 (8) TMI 617 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax Appeals: Interest Income Classification, Deduction Eligibility reassessed for Assessment Years 1991-92 to 1993-94 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for the assessment years 1991-92, 1992-93, and 1993-94, directing the CIT(A) to re-examine issues related to the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tax Appeals: Interest Income Classification, Deduction Eligibility reassessed for Assessment Years 1991-92 to 1993-94

                          The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for the assessment years 1991-92, 1992-93, and 1993-94, directing the CIT(A) to re-examine issues related to the classification of interest income and the admissibility of deduction under section 80HHC. The additional ground of appeal concerning the reopening of assessment under sections 147/148 was dismissed, affirming the validity of the notice issued by the Assessing Officer.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Reopening of assessment under section 147/148 of the Income-tax Act.
                          2. Classification of interest income as business income or income from other sources.
                          3. Admissibility of deduction under section 80HHC.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Reopening of Assessment under Section 147/148:

                          The additional ground of appeal concerns the validity of the notice issued under sections 147/148. The assessee argued that the reopening of the assessment was based on a transaction with M/s. Manoj Diamonds, which was found to be valid, and not on account of interest. The assessee contended that all material facts were disclosed with the return, making the reopening invalid.

                          The Tribunal examined the reasons for the notice issuance, which were based on a letter from the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 19(2), Mumbai. The letter indicated that M/s. Manoj Diamond did not perform any labour work for the assessee, suggesting hawala activities. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment, fulfilling the conditions under section 147.

                          The Tribunal held that the legality of the notice should be judged based on materials available at the time of initiation, not subsequent events. The Assessing Officer had the authority to tax any other escaped income noticed during reassessment proceedings, even if it was not the reason for the initial notice. The Tribunal dismissed the additional ground of appeal, affirming the validity of the notice under section 147.

                          2. Classification of Interest Income:

                          The assessee argued that interest income from fixed deposits and loans should be classified as business income, as the deposits were kept to avail credit facilities for the export business. The Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) classified the interest income as income from other sources, excluding it from the computation of deduction under section 80HHC.

                          The Tribunal noted that the issue had been extensively litigated and cited relevant case law, including decisions from the jurisdictional High Court. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the issue for re-examination, directing the CIT(A) to consider the admissibility of deduction under section 80HHC in light of relevant decisions and after providing an opportunity for hearing to both parties.

                          3. Admissibility of Deduction under Section 80HHC:

                          The main grounds of appeal were interlinked with the classification of interest income. The assessee contended that the entire income should be considered as profit of the business for the assessment year 1991-92, as the law was amended to exclude 90% of the interest from the assessment year 1992-93 onwards.

                          The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to re-examine the admissibility of deduction under section 80HHC, considering the relevant case law and decisions, and to provide a reasonable opportunity for hearing to both parties. The Tribunal allowed the main grounds of appeal for statistical purposes, pending re-examination by the CIT(A).

                          In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for the assessment years 1991-92, 1992-93, and 1993-94, directing the CIT(A) to re-examine the issues related to the classification of interest income and the admissibility of deduction under section 80HHC. The additional ground of appeal regarding the reopening of assessment under section 147/148 was dismissed, affirming the validity of the notice.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found