Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether different trade discounts granted to different buyers, including buyers within the same class, were deductible from assessable value under central excise valuation law.
Analysis: The discounts were found to be based on commercial considerations such as the nature of the buyer, quantity purchased, market conditions, competition, and the need to penetrate new markets. The mere fact that discounts varied between two industrial consumers did not by itself establish that the discounts were impermissible. There was no allegation of any flow back or that the discounts were not actually passed on. Since the discounts were reflected in invoices, the objection that they were not intimated to the department was not accepted. On the settled valuation principle, different prices may be charged even within the same class of buyers if supported by bona fide commercial reasons.
Conclusion: The different discounts were allowable deductions and could not be disallowed merely because they were not uniform across all buyers or all buyers within the same class.
Ratio Decidendi: Under central excise valuation law, trade discounts supported by commercial considerations and actually passed on are deductible even if they vary between buyers or within the same class of buyers.