Brand name misuse and unaccounted goods justified denial of SSI exemption, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty.

Use of another person's brand name or logo disqualifies an assessee from Small Scale Industry exemption, so the exemption claim was rightly rejected. The decision also held that goods admittedly not accounted for in statutory records were liable to confiscation, and the resulting redemption fine and penalty were sustainable because the matter was not a mere bookkeeping lapse. The adjudication restoring the duty demand, confiscation and penalty was therefore upheld.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether use of another person's logo or house mark disentitled the assessee to Small Scale Industry exemption; (ii) whether confiscation of unaccounted goods and imposition of redemption fine and penalty were sustainable.

Issue (i): whether use of another person's logo or house mark disentitled the assessee to Small Scale Industry exemption.

Analysis: The assessee was found to be using the logo of another person on its products. The exemption claim was rejected in view of the settled principle that use of another person's brand name or logo takes the goods out of the benefit of the Small Scale Industry exemption.

Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the Small Scale Industry exemption.

Issue (ii): whether confiscation of unaccounted goods and imposition of redemption fine and penalty were sustainable.

Analysis: The seized goods were admittedly not accounted for in the records. Such non-accountal justified confiscation and related penal consequences under the Central Excise Rules. The case was not one of a mere bookkeeping lapse.

Conclusion: Confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were sustainable.

Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge succeeded and the adjudication restoring duty demand, confiscation and penalty was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: Use of another person's brand name or logo disqualifies an assessee from Small Scale Industry exemption, and unaccounted excisable goods are liable to confiscation with consequential penal action under the Central Excise Rules.

---