Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The dispute concerned classification of pre-fabricated building and public telephone booth goods. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner had given reasons for classifying the goods under Chapter Heading 7308 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 rather than under Heading 9406.00. On a perusal of the impugned order, the Tribunal found that it appeared correct and sustainable. No material was placed to show a prima facie case in favour of the appellants, and no financial hardship was pleaded.
Conclusion: The appellants were not entitled to waiver of pre-deposit, and the direction to pre-deposit the duty amount was upheld.