Speaking order requirement and personal hearing defects justified remand in fiscal adjudication proceedings.

Adjudication orders in fiscal proceedings must address annexure-wise duty liability, consider the evidence and citations relied on by the parties, and record findings on confiscability where alleged. Where an order omits these matters and imposes penalty without granting personal hearing, it fails the requirement of a speaking order and breaches natural justice. The defective orders were set aside, and the connected order also fell because it depended on the earlier order. The matters were remanded for de novo adjudication after affording personal hearing and following natural justice.

---

---

Issues: Whether the adjudication orders could be sustained in view of the absence of a speaking order, non-consideration of the annexures and evidence, and denial of personal hearing, and whether the matters required remand for fresh adjudication.

Analysis: The adjudication orders were found to be deficient because they did not contain detailed discussion on the duty liability annexure-wise, did not address the citations relied upon by the appellants, and recorded no finding on confiscability despite the allegations in the show cause notice. The penalty on one of the noticees had also been imposed without granting personal hearing. These defects amounted to a serious breach of the principles of natural justice and showed that the matters had not been decided by a proper speaking order. As the subsequent order also depended upon the earlier order already set aside, the connected order likewise could not be sustained.

Conclusion: The adjudication orders were set aside and the matters were remanded to the original authority for de novo consideration after granting personal hearing and observing the principles of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi: An adjudication order in fiscal proceedings must be a speaking order that considers the material issues and affords a fair hearing; failure to do so warrants remand for fresh decision.

---