Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants, having failed to implement the project and fulfil the conditions of the Letter of Permission within its validity period, were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 136/94 dated 10-11-1994 and the concession available to a 100% Export Oriented Unit, and whether the penalty required reduction.
Analysis: The appellants had obtained registration as a 100% EOU for manufacture and export of cut flowers, but the Letter of Permission had expired without the project being implemented or the export conditions being satisfied. On that admitted factual position, the benefit of the notification and the EOU concession was held to be unavailable, and the duty demand was sustained. However, considering the facts and circumstances, the penalty was found excessive and was reduced.
Conclusion: The duty demand was upheld, while the penalty was reduced to Rs. 5,000.