Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue could sustain an appeal and demand of duty on a classification ground that was neither stated in the show cause notice nor decided in the adjudication order.
Analysis: The demand had originally been proposed only on the footing that proof of duty payment on the chassis was not furnished for availing the concession under Notification No. 162/86-C.E., as amended. The show cause notices did not allege that the bus bodies fabricated on chassis were classifiable under Heading 87.07. The appellate proceedings were therefore being used to introduce an entirely new basis for duty demand. Since a new case cannot be made out in appeal proceedings and the authority cannot travel beyond the scope of the show cause notice, the impugned orders were unsustainable.
Conclusion: The new classification ground could not be entertained, and the demand confirmed on that basis was set aside in favour of the assessee.