Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on moulds supplied to a manufacturer for use in job-work operations was admissible when the manufacturer of the parts used its own raw materials and was treated as a job worker.
Analysis: Admissibility of credit on the moulds depended on the status of the recipient as a job worker for the purpose of Rule 57S(8). The original authority had denied that status and disallowed credit, but the appellate authority accepted that the parts were manufactured for the assessee's specifications and relied on earlier Tribunal authority recognising a similar manufacturer as a job worker even though it had procured its own raw materials. Following that precedent, the Tribunal held that the credit could not be denied merely because the manufacturer used its own materials.
Conclusion: The mould recipient was a job worker for the purpose of Rule 57S(8), and the Modvat credit on the moulds was admissible.