Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of bought-out items used in an electronic weighing system erected at site was includible in the assessable value of the system, and whether the system was excisable goods or an immovable property.
Analysis: The system was assembled and installed at the customers' site from manufactured and bought-out components, with only the consoles/data processors manufactured in the factory. The decisive question was whether the finished system could be treated as excisable goods in CKD or unassembled form. The Board's circular/order under Section 37B of the Central Excise Act had clarified that where the final product is immovable and hence not excisable goods, the same cannot be treated as dutiable as a whole merely because it is cleared in parts, though identifiable excisable components remain liable on their own clearance. On that approach, the electronic weighing system erected at site was not excisable goods, while the consoles/data processors remained separately classifiable as automatic data processing machines under Heading 84.71.
Conclusion: The value of the bought-out items was not includible in the assessable value of the electronic weighing system, and the demand of duty was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the final product erected at site is immovable property and not excisable goods, its value cannot be assessed as a whole in CKD or unassembled form, though separately identifiable excisable components remain dutiable on clearance.