Tribunal rules in favor of Appellant, finding goods non-excisable and granting exemption under Notification.

The Tribunal held that the demand and penalties against the Appellant were unsustainable. The goods installed at the customer's site were deemed immovable and non-excisable. The bought-out items directly delivered to the site were not part of any excisable goods, and the Appellant qualified for exemption under Notification No. 67/95-CE. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal with consequential reliefs.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Inclusion of the value of bought-out items in the assessable value of the goods.
2. Determination of excisability of goods manufactured and installed at the customer’s site.
3. Eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 67/95-CE.
4. Applicability of extended period for demand and imposition of penalties.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Inclusion of the Value of Bought-Out Items in the Assessable Value:
The adjudicating authority determined that the value of bought-out items, which are essential for the functionality of the goods contracted by the buyer from the Appellant, should be included in the transaction value. This decision was based on the contract for an 80 TPH Boiler, where the Appellant was responsible for designing, procuring, manufacturing, and supplying the boiler, including critical components purchased from other vendors. The authority concluded that the completion of the manufacturing process at the customer’s site, using these bought-out items, necessitated their inclusion in the assessable value. However, the Appellant argued that the bought-out items were directly delivered to the site and were already duty-paid, thus should not be included in the assessable value.

2. Determination of Excisability of Goods Manufactured and Installed at the Customer’s Site:
The adjudicating authority held that the Appellant manufactured excisable goods (e.g., Mill House, Cane Unloader, etc.) at the customer’s site, which were movable and could be dismantled and reassembled. The Appellant contended that these items, once installed, became immovable property and thus non-excisable. They relied on Supreme Court decisions and a CBEC circular stating that goods incapable of being sold, shifted, and marketed without dismantling are considered immovable and non-excisable. The Tribunal agreed with the Appellant, noting that the goods in question were part of large systems (e.g., boilers) permanently attached to the earth, and their removal would require dismantling, making them non-excisable.

3. Eligibility for Exemption under Notification No. 67/95-CE:
The Appellant argued that even if the goods were considered excisable, they were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 67/95-CE, which exempts goods manufactured and used within the factory of production. The Tribunal found that the goods, being capital goods used within the sugar mills, met the conditions of the notification. Therefore, even if the Appellant's activities were considered manufacturing, the goods would still be exempt from duty under this notification.

4. Applicability of Extended Period for Demand and Imposition of Penalties:
The Tribunal noted that the facts were known to the revenue from the beginning, and a previous demand on similar grounds had been set aside by the Tribunal and upheld by the High Court. Therefore, there was no suppression or malafide intent on the part of the Appellant. Consequently, the Tribunal held that invoking the extended period for demand and imposing penalties was not justified.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the demand and penalties confirmed against the Appellant were not sustainable. The goods installed at the customer’s site were considered immovable property and non-excisable. Additionally, the bought-out items directly delivered to the site were not part of any excisable goods, and the Appellant was eligible for exemption under Notification No. 67/95-CE. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential reliefs.

---