Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ionisation smoke detectors imported by the assessee were entitled to concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 79/93-Cus.
Analysis: The goods were found to operate on the basis of a change in pre-set voltage when smoke is present, which triggers an alarm. On that basis, they were not treated as instruments or apparatus for measuring or checking electrical quantities within the scope of the exemption entry. Relief under the other relevant entry was also unavailable because the goods were classifiable under Heading 9022.19, and no claim was made under the remaining entries of the notification.
Conclusion: The goods were not entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 79/93-Cus., and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.