Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of the disallowed Modvat credit on the footing that the disputed items were inputs or accessories covered under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The disputed articles, including assembly wheel cover, tool bag, carpet and radio cover, were treated as accessories specifically covered as inputs. Rule 57A permitted Modvat credit on goods used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products, whether used directly or indirectly and whether or not contained in the final product. On that basis, the claim that the items were eligible inputs was considered to disclose a strong prima facie case.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and recovery of the entire amount was stayed during the pendency of the appeals.
Ratio Decidendi: Accessories used in or in relation to manufacture can qualify as inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A, and such eligibility can justify waiver of pre-deposit when a strong prima facie case is shown.