Valuation-based customs violation challenge justified full pre-deposit waiver and stay where enhanced value could not support Section 111(d) finding.

On a prima facie view, valuation could not be enhanced to USD 300 per MT while still sustaining a finding of violation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, along with redemption fine and penalty. The earlier remand had proceeded on the basis that, if that valuation was adopted, the offer of SIL would be accepted and the goods released without liability for breach of the EXIM Policy. In this context, full waiver of the pre-deposit requirement was granted and recovery was stayed pending final disposal of the appeals.

---

---

Issues: Whether full waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were justified in the appeals, in view of the prima facie challenge to the valuation-based finding of violation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962.

Analysis: The order records that, on a prima facie view, the Commissioner could not raise the valuation to USD 300 per MT and still sustain a finding of violation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, together with redemption fine and penalty. The earlier remand direction had proceeded on the basis that if valuation was arrived at USD 300 per MT, the offer of SIL was to be accepted and the goods released without liability for violation of the EXIM Policy.

Outcome: Full waiver of the pre-deposit requirement was granted and recovery was stayed pending final decision in the appeals.

---