Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was liable for penalty for abetting the attempted smuggling of foreign currency and travellers cheques, and whether the penalty of Rs. 25,000 imposed under the Customs Act was warranted.
Analysis: The appellant was found to have been involved in the customs clearance process without proper authorisation and to have facilitated concealment of foreign currency and travellers cheques in export cargo. On the facts, the appellant had knowledge of the attempted export of the currency and had assisted in completing the formalities, bringing the case within the confiscation and penalty provisions applied by the adjudicating authority. The quantum of penalty was also examined and found to be modest in relation to the value of the seized currency and travellers cheques.
Conclusion: The appellant was held liable for penalty, and the penalty of Rs. 25,000 was upheld.