Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to DEPB credit at the revised rates notified by Public Notice No. 62 (RE-2002)/2002-2007 dated 17-2-2003, with effect from 1-4-2002, instead of the lower rates applied by the department.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the effect of the subsequent public notice revising DEPB rates and stating that, for covered items, the revised rates and the period of their effectiveness would be governed by the notice and its annexure. Since the claim required examination of the revised rates and their applicability to the exports in question, the matter could not be finally concluded without verification by the jurisdictional adjudicating authority.
Conclusion: The appellant's claim was not finally decided on merits by the Tribunal, and the matter was remanded for application of the rates revised by Public Notice No. 62 (RE-2002)/2002-2007 dated 17-2-2003.