Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the valuation of yarn captively consumed in the manufacture of fabrics in a composite mill, the cost of warping and winding is includible in the assessable value of the yarn.
Analysis: The majority held that yarn emerges as excisable goods at the spindle stage, but under Chapter Note 1 to Chapter 52 and Chapter Note 3 to Chapter 55, warping and winding are also manufacturing processes. Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 deems captive yarn to be removed immediately before its consumption in fabric manufacture. Since the stage of deemed removal is after the yarn has undergone warping and winding, the value for duty purposes must include the cost of those processes. The majority further held that the exemption under Notification No. 5/99-C.E. supports the conclusion that the processes may be exempt when undertaken on duty-paid yarn in another factory, but that exemption does not alter valuation where the processes are undertaken in the integrated factory before deemed removal. The reasoning adopted the principle that all processes carried out before removal from the factory form part of assessable value.
Conclusion: The cost of warping and winding is includible in the assessable value of captively consumed yarn and the Revenue's appeal fails.
Ratio Decidendi: Where excisable goods are deemed to be removed only after undergoing manufacturing processes in an integrated factory, the cost of all such processes carried out before the deemed removal is includible in assessable value, even if those processes would be exempt when performed on duty-paid goods in another factory.