Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported Polaroid Digital Imaging System was classifiable under Heading No. 8471.50 as an automatic data processing system or under Heading No. 9006.53 as a photographic camera.
Analysis: The imported goods were found to be a composite digital imaging system with camera-related components and an ADP element. The classification turned on the principal function of the machine. Since the literature and description showed that the system was directed towards capturing photographic images and converting them into photographs on film or CD, the ADP component was only supportive and served to enhance the main imaging function. In such composite goods, the tariff heading is determined by the predominant function, and trade parlance and the catalogue description supported treatment of the goods as photographic equipment rather than a computer.
Conclusion: The goods are classifiable under Heading No. 9006.53 and not under Heading No. 8471.50; the view taken by the Revenue was accepted.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a composite machine has multiple components, its tariff classification is governed by its principal function, and an ADP element used only to support or enhance the main photographic function does not change its essential classification as photographic equipment.