Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on capital goods transferred from one unit to another after lapse of time, where the transfer was supported by challans and the Revenue disputed the availability of proper duty paying documents and prior availment of credit at the originating unit.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same assessee for a different period and held that the movement of capital goods from the Pune unit to the Noida unit was not in dispute. It accepted that the challans cross-referencing the duty payment particulars were sufficient for the transfer of the capital goods. The Tribunal also found no material to show that the disputed credit had in fact been taken at the Pune unit in respect of all the goods concerned, and noted that the credit had either not been taken or had been reversed to the extent admitted.
Conclusion: The credit was held admissible at the Noida unit, and the assessee succeeded on the issue.