Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on rejected goods received back from buyers under valid duty-paying documents and used as inputs in the manufacture of final products.
Analysis: The rejected goods were received back due to damage in transit under valid duty-paying documents and were actually used as inputs in the manufacture of final products on which duty was again paid. The issue was covered by the Tribunal's earlier view that once such duty-paid goods are used as inputs, credit is available under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, supported by the Board circular relied upon. In the absence of any contrary authority, disallowance of credit could not be sustained.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible and the disallowance was set aside, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Duty-paid rejected goods received back under valid documents and used as inputs in the manufacture of final products qualify for Modvat credit.