Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the process of cutting and packing undertaken for export goods falls within the expression "any other operation" in Rule 13 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 so as to entitle the assessee to the benefit of Notification No. 49/94-C.E. dated 22-9-1994.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the scope of the definition of "manufacture" in Rule 13 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Tribunal treated the question as already settled by earlier decisions holding that the definition has very wide coverage and that cutting and packing for export is covered by "any other operation". The Tribunal followed its earlier view and the connected precedent relied upon therein, and saw no reason to differ from that line of authority.
Conclusion: The process of cutting and packing qualified as an eligible operation under Rule 13 and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 49/94-C.E. dated 22-9-1994.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed and the order granting the notification benefit to the exporter was affirmed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory definition of manufacture under Rule 13 is wide enough to include cutting and packing for export as "any other operation", the exemption benefit under the notification cannot be denied on that ground.