Prima facie entitlement to Modvat credit justified waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.

Prima facie entitlement to Modvat credit on inputs in stock, work-in-progress and finished goods was found sufficient to justify waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. The tribunal noted that, for the relevant period, Rule 57H(1) did not require the Assistant Commissioner's prior satisfaction on stock verification in the manner suggested by the department, and the assessee's declaration could not realistically have been filed earlier because the department had initially treated the final product as exempt before changing its classification to a dutiable heading. Interim relief was therefore granted and recovery remained stayed pending appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the disputed duty and penalty.

Analysis: The application arose from disallowance of Modvat credit on inputs lying in stock, in work-in-progress, and in final products on the grounds that no declaration had been filed under Rule 57H(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and that credit could not be taken suo motu. The declaration was filed on 31-3-1998 and received on 6-4-1998, and the queries raised by the departmental officer were answered. Prima facie, Rule 57H(1) as applicable during the relevant period did not require satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner regarding verification of stock, unlike the earlier version of the rule. The appellants also could not effectively have filed the declaration earlier, since the department had initially treated the final product as exempt and only later changed its stand and classified it under a dutiable heading.

Conclusion: A prima facie case for waiver was made out and the requirement of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with, with recovery stayed pending the appeal.

Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted to the appellants on the basis that the dispute raised a triable issue and justified suspension of recovery during the pendency of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee shows a prima facie entitlement and the relevant rule, as applicable to the period in dispute, does not impose the procedural requirement relied upon by the department, pre-deposit may be waived and recovery stayed pending appeal.

---