Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on capital goods received in the factory before 23-7-1996 could be denied by applying Notification No. 14/96-C.E. (N.T.) dated 23-7-96, and whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery should be granted.
Analysis: The appeal involved denial of Modvat credit on capital goods received before the effective date of the notification. On a prima facie appraisal, applying Notification No. 14/96-C.E. (N.T.) dated 23-7-96 to such receipts appeared incorrect. That prima facie view was sufficient to justify interim protection against recovery.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted.