TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on HDPE bags used for packing finished products, having regard to the exclusion in the Explanation to Rule 57A(1) for bags or sacks made out of fabrics woven from strips or tapes of plastics.
Analysis: The exclusion was not confined to bags or sacks made out of textile fabric. Any woven material could amount to fabric for the purpose of the provision. Since the bags were made from material woven out of plastic strips and tapes, they fell within the exclusionary wording of the rule.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was not admissible on the HDPE bags and the denial of credit was upheld.
TaxTMI 
