Modvat credit on returned goods denied for lack of proof of job work and eligible input status.

Modvat credit on goods returned from consignees for re-processing or reduction in thickness was denied where the assessee failed to prove that the returned goods were received under a genuine job work arrangement or for eligible further processing. Although duty-paid gate passes and consignee letters seeking thickness reduction were produced, the record did not show payment for processing or other terms of the arrangement. The goods were also not entered in RG 23A Part I or the raw material register, and no material established that they qualified as admissible inputs for Modvat purposes. Credit was therefore held inadmissible and the denial was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on goods received back from consignees for re-processing or reduction in thickness.

Analysis: The appellants claimed credit on the basis of duty-paid gate passes and asserted that the returned goods were received for further reduction in thickness. The record showed letters from the consignees requesting reduction of thickness, but there was no evidence of the terms of any job work arrangement or of payment for the alleged further processing. The goods were not entered as inputs in RG 23A Part I or in the raw material register, and no material was produced to show that the returned goods qualified as eligible inputs for Modvat purposes.

Conclusion: Modvat credit was not admissible and the denial of credit was upheld against the assessee.

---