Spent earth from vegetable oil bleaching is not excisable absent a new and distinct commodity with separate commercial identity.

Spent earth generated during the bleaching of vegetable oil was held not to be excisable under Heading 1507.00 because the process produced only a waste residue, not a new and distinct commodity with a separate commercial identity. Its sale for recovery of contained oil did not establish excisability, and the mere fact that it fetched a price was irrelevant to duty liability. On that basis, the duty demand could not be sustained and the classification and duty orders were set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether spent earth arising during bleaching of vegetable oil was excisable under Heading 1507.00 of the Central Excise Tariff.

Analysis: The spent earth emerged as a waste material in the course of manufacturing hydrogenated vegetable oil. Its sale for recovery of the oil contained in it did not, by itself, establish excisability. No new and distinct commodity with a different name, character, or commercial identity came into existence during the bleaching process. The fact that the residue was sold for a price was held to be irrelevant to the determination of excisability.

Conclusion: The spent earth was not excisable and the duty demand could not be sustained.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the classification and duty orders were set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: A residue or waste arising in manufacture is not excisable merely because it is sold, unless the process brings into existence a new and distinct commodity having a separate commercial identity.

---