TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the tipping-gear assembly manufactured and cleared by the assessee was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 118/75-C.E., and whether it was excluded by the second proviso to that notification.
Analysis: The exemption was available where the goods were used in the factory in which they were manufactured. The tipping-gear assembly was not a complete machine disqualified by the second proviso; it was an essential component of tipper trucks manufactured in the same factory and used in the manufacture of those trucks. The reference to Notification No. 167/79-C.E. was found irrelevant to the dispute.
Conclusion: The tipping-gear assembly was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 118/75-C.E. and was not hit by the second proviso.
TaxTMI 
