Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether plastic carry bags enclosed with footwear cartons were eligible for Modvat credit as inputs or packing materials under Rule 57A and Rule 57B(1)(v) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The carry bags were not used in the manufacture of footwear, either directly or indirectly, and were not even used in relation to manufacture. They were placed in the cartons only to facilitate the consumer's carrying of the footwear after sale, which made them part of a post-manufacture activity. Inclusion of their cost in the assessable value did not by itself establish eligibility for credit. The earlier Tribunal decision on similar carry bags was treated as covering the issue, and the cited Supreme Court and motor vehicle decisions did not assist because they did not establish the required nexus between the bags and manufacture.
Conclusion: The plastic carry bags were not eligible inputs for Modvat credit, and the claim failed against the assessee.