Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner company's name, once struck off from the Register of Companies under section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956, should be restored under section 560(6), and whether such restoration could be made conditional upon compliance with outstanding statutory filings and payment of costs.
Analysis: The company had been struck off for persistent non-filing of annual returns and balance sheets. The Court accepted that service of the statutory notices could be presumed from the correct registered office address on record. It also noted that the company was functional and had been active since incorporation, but emphasised that responsibility for statutory compliance remained with the management even if filing work had been entrusted to professionals. At the same time, the petition was filed within the prescribed twenty-year period and restoration was considered consistent with the object of section 560(6), namely to enable revival where the interests of justice so require. The Court further held that the circumstances disclosed casual and irresponsible conduct, warranting exemplary costs and directions for filing all pending statutory documents before restoration took effect.
Conclusion: Restoration of the company's name to the Register was allowed, but only on payment of costs and on filing all outstanding statutory returns and balance sheets with the requisite fees and formalities.
Ratio Decidendi: A company whose name has been struck off under section 560 may be restored under section 560(6) where it is functional and restoration is in the interests of justice, but the Court may make restoration conditional upon full compliance with pending statutory obligations and payment of appropriate costs.