Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2010 (8) TMI 182 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court orders Official Liquidator to return leased land, allows arrears claim against bank post-lease expiry. The court directed the Official Liquidator to hand over vacant possession of the leased land to the Applicant within three months as the lease had expired ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                            Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                                Court orders Official Liquidator to return leased land, allows arrears claim against bank post-lease expiry.

                                The court directed the Official Liquidator to hand over vacant possession of the leased land to the Applicant within three months as the lease had expired and was not required for winding up the affairs of the Company. The court allowed the Applicant to pursue claims for arrears against Canara Bank and emphasized that the security interest of the bank was valid only until the lease expiry. The Official Liquidator was ordered to remove all movables from the land, and the Company Application was disposed of with no order as to costs.




                                Issues Involved:
                                1. Entitlement to possession of the leased land.
                                2. Payment of arrears of rent and municipal property tax.
                                3. Validity and renewal of lease.
                                4. Impact of the pending civil suit and appeal on possession rights.
                                5. Rights of the Official Liquidator and Canara Bank regarding the leased land.

                                Detailed Analysis:

                                1. Entitlement to Possession of the Leased Land:
                                The Applicant, M/s. Hardcastle Waud Manufacturing Company Limited, sought directions for the Official Liquidator to hand over possession of the property situated at Netivali Baug, Kalyan. The lease, originally granted in 1960 for 25 years, expired on 31st May 1985. The Official Liquidator, acting on behalf of the Respondent Company, did not issue the required notice for renewal as per the lease deed, leading to the determination of the lease by efflux of time. The court noted that the land had not been used by the Official Liquidator for over 25 years and was not required for winding up the affairs of the Company. Consequently, the court directed the Official Liquidator to hand over the vacant possession of the land to the Applicant within three months.

                                2. Payment of Arrears of Rent and Municipal Property Tax:
                                The Applicant also sought payment of Rs.14,250 towards arrears of rent and municipal property tax. The court acknowledged that the Official Liquidator had not paid municipal property taxes for a significant period, resulting in arrears amounting to over Rs. 6,50,000. The court allowed the Applicant to pursue claims for arrears of rent, taxes, electricity, and water charges against Canara Bank, the secured creditor, since the second renewal of the lease was sought at their instance.

                                3. Validity and Renewal of Lease:
                                The lease deed provided an option for renewal for another 25 years upon giving six months' notice in advance. However, no such notice was given, and therefore, the lease stood determined on 31st May 1985. Even if the lease had been renewed, it would have expired on 31st May 2010. The court concluded that the leasehold rights were no longer an asset of the Respondent Company and could not be retained by the Official Liquidator beyond this period.

                                4. Impact of the Pending Civil Suit and Appeal on Possession Rights:
                                The Applicant had previously filed a civil suit seeking possession of the land, which was dismissed, and an appeal was pending. The court held that the dismissal of the suit did not affect the determination of the lease by efflux of time. The court emphasized that the Applicant was entitled to possession as the lease had expired, and the land was not being used by the Official Liquidator. The Applicant was directed to withdraw the pending appeal upon receiving possession of the land.

                                5. Rights of the Official Liquidator and Canara Bank Regarding the Leased Land:
                                The Official Liquidator opposed the application, citing the pending appeal and a previous court order from 2000, which required the Applicant to adopt appropriate proceedings to recover possession. The court found that the previous order was based on the subsistence of the lease at that time. With the lease now determined, a fresh cause of action had arisen. The security interest of Canara Bank, created by the Respondent Company, was valid only until the expiry of the lease. Since the lease had ended, the Respondent Company could no longer offer the land as security.

                                Conclusion:
                                The court ordered the Official Liquidator to remove all movables from the land and hand over vacant possession to the Applicant within three months. The Applicant was allowed to pursue claims for arrears against Canara Bank. The Company Application was disposed of with no order as to costs.
                                Full Summary is available for active users!
                                Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                                Topics

                                ActsIncome Tax
                                No Records Found