Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for working out the benefit of Notification No. 245/83 and determining assessable value on the basis of retail price less 15% discount, the amount of excise duty deductible before allowing the discount includes special excise duty payable under the relevant Finance Act.
Analysis: The notification required the assessable value to be determined with reference to retail price after deducting excise duty and then allowing the stipulated discount. The expression "value" in the notification had to be read consistently with the scheme of Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excises Act, 1944, which excludes from assessable value not only duty of excise under the Central enactment but also the aggregate of effective excise duties under other Central enactments. The explanation to the notification was understood as fixing the sequence of deduction, not as restricting the deduction to basic excise duty alone. In the absence of a contrary indication in the notification, the statutory meaning of "value" governed the computation.
Conclusion: The deductible excise duty included special excise duty under the relevant Finance Act, and the contrary view of the lower authorities was incorrect.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification uses the expression "value" without excluding the statutory scheme, assessable value must be computed in accordance with Section 4(4)(d)(ii), so all excise duties excluded by that provision are deductible unless the notification expressly provides otherwise.