Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the claim for rent, electricity and water charges for the period after the winding-up order and until delivery of possession constituted costs, charges and expenses incurred in winding up, or a debt to be adjudicated with other claims.
Analysis: Section 476 of the Companies Act, 1956 empowers the Court, where the assets are insufficient, to direct payment of costs, charges and expenses incurred in winding up. The expression is distinct from "debts" and the two categories are mutually exclusive. Sections 529A and 530 of the Companies Act, 1956 deal with workmen's dues, secured creditors and other debts, but do not absorb expenses incurred in the winding-up process. Rule 338 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 likewise distinguishes the expenses of preserving, realizing and getting in the assets from ordinary debt claims. As the amount claimed related to the period during which the property remained in the custody of the Official Liquidator after winding up, it was incidental to the liquidation process and not a debt requiring general adjudication with other creditors.
Conclusion: The claim was payable as costs, charges and expenses of winding up and not as an ordinary debt; the appellant was entitled to payment without awaiting final adjudication of other claims.