Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a prima facie case was made out for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty and stay of recovery pending appeal, having regard to the condition of the applicable exemption notification and the use of the imported and indigenously procured goods.
Analysis: The applications concerned pre-deposit of duties and penalties arising from demands based on alleged non-fulfilment of the conditions of Notification No. 196/94-Cus. The Tribunal noted the submission that the imported capital goods, raw material and indigenously procured goods had been put to use in the operational requirements of the aquaculture farm, and that crop failure prevented fulfilment of the export obligation. In the absence of any averment or finding that the goods were not used in production, and having regard to the language of the notification, the Tribunal found that a prima facie case for waiver was made out.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed pending the appeals.