Modvat credit cannot be denied for subsidiary gate pass defects when duty-paid inputs and manufacturing use are established.

Modvat credit could not be denied merely because subsidiary gate passes were issued after 1-4-1994, where the credit rested on original gate passes and Range Superintendent certificates, and the duty-paid nature of the inputs was not in dispute. The applicable notification on subsidiary gate passes did not justify rejection on these facts, and Notification No. 7/99-C.E. (N.T.) required deficiencies in duty-paying documents to be ignored once duty-paid character and use in manufacture were established. As both conditions were satisfied, the documentary defect did not defeat credit and the denial was unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied merely because the credit was taken on subsidiary gate passes issued after 1-4-1994, when the duty-paid nature of the goods was not in dispute and the documents related to original gate passes issued before that date.

Analysis: The credit was supported by subsidiary gate passes issued on the basis of original gate passes and certificates issued by the Range Superintendent. The duty-paid character of the inputs was not disputed. The applicable notification governing subsidiary gate passes did not warrant denial on the facts, and the later amendment under Notification No. 7/99-C.E. (N.T.) required deficiencies in duty-paying documents to be ignored where duty-paid nature of the goods and their use in manufacture were established. As both requirements stood satisfied, the documentary defect could not defeat credit.

Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible and the denial of credit was unsustainable, in favour of the assessee.

---