Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of exemption from cess under the relevant notification, the expression "industrial undertaking" referred only to the paper/paperboard manufacturing unit or extended to the entire integrated concern including the sugar mill.
Analysis: The expression "industrial undertaking" was not defined in the governing enactment, and the notification was issued in the context of cess on paper, paper pulp and paper products. The relevant expression was therefore construed in its ordinary trade sense and in the context of the manufacturing unit to which the levy and exemption related. On that construction, it would be incorrect to aggregate all industries belonging to the same concern at the same location when the exemption was intended to operate with reference to the paper unit alone.
Conclusion: The exemption had to be confined to the undertaking manufacturing paper and paper products, and not to the sugar mill and other units taken together. The Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order granting the exemption on the basis of the paper-manufacturing unit was sustained, and the Revenue appeal stood rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxing exemption notification uses the expression "industrial undertaking" in relation to a specific manufacturing activity, the expression is to be construed contextually and as referring to the relevant industrial unit, not to all units of a composite concern.