Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery should be granted in respect of the duty demands and penalties, and to what extent.
Analysis: The applications were considered on a prima facie basis. The demand relating to loaded value of lagging sheets was not found fit for complete waiver because the plea based on CAS-4 valuation and the Board's circular did not establish a strong case for retrospective application. The demand concerning repacked solution and hardener raised a substantial limitation objection, as the entire demand was beyond the normal period and no definite finding supporting extended limitation was located. For the demands founded on clubbing of clearances, an earlier final finding in the same parties' case had held that the clearances of the two units could not be clubbed for SSI purposes, and that finding was treated as binding at this stage. On that basis, a strong prima facie case was made out for waiver of the major portion of the duty and for dispensation with pre-deposit of the penalty amounts.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed for the duty demands other than the amount of Rs. 5.46 lakhs, which was directed to be deposited, and the penalty pre-deposit requirement was also dispensed with.