Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sizing of duty-paid yarn, in the light of the amended Chapter Notes and Section 2(f)(ii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, amounted to manufacture so as to attract central excise duty, and whether exemption under Notification No. 35/95-C.E. dated 16.03.1995, as amended by Notification No. 84/95-C.E. dated 18.05.1995, was available.
Analysis: The applicable tariff notes introduced by the 1995 amendments were examined, including the relevant chapter notes to the textile chapters. Under Section 2(f)(ii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, a process specified in the section or chapter notes of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as amounting to manufacture is treated as manufacture by deeming fiction. On that footing, sizing of yarn when carried out on duty-paid yarn was treated as a manufacturing process. Since the process fell within the statutory definition of manufacture, the claimed exemption notification was not available.
Conclusion: Sizing of yarn was held to amount to manufacture and the duty demand was sustained. The exemption was denied and the appeals failed.
Final Conclusion: The levy of duty on sizing of yarn was upheld and the appeals were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a process is specified in the chapter notes as amounting to manufacture, Section 2(f)(ii) treats that process as manufacture for central excise purposes, and exemption unavailable on that basis cannot be claimed.