Customs duty refund on undelivered imported goods falls outside Section 74 drawback when Customs sends them back after wrongful supply is found.

Customs duty refund on goods that were never released into the importer's control was treated as outside the drawback framework under Section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962. Where imported goods were found on examination to have been wrongly supplied, the importer relinquished title and Customs itself sent the goods back, the matter was not treated as a re-export by the importer attracting the statutory drawback mechanism. On that basis, Section 74 was held inapplicable and the refund claim was maintainable, with consequential relief following.

---

---

Issues: Whether refund of customs duty was governed by Section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962 when the imported goods were never cleared by the importer and were sent back by the Customs Authorities.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the case involved re-export by the importer so as to attract the drawback mechanism under Section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962. The goods had been imported against the declared description, but on examination they were found to be wrongly supplied. The importer relinquished title and the Customs Authorities themselves sent the goods back after satisfying themselves that the goods had been wrongly dispatched. In these circumstances, the goods had never come under the importer's control, and the statutory framework for drawback on re-export was held inapplicable.

Conclusion: Section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962 was held not to apply, and the refund claim was maintainable. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods are never released into the importer's control and are sent back by Customs because they were wrongly supplied, the re-export drawback provision does not govern the claim for refund of duty.

---