Modvat credit exclusion for diesel products requires specific inclusion of the exact item; flash-character differences alone are insufficient.

Notification No. 5/94 excluded High Speed Diesel from Modvat credit, and the Tribunal treated that exclusion as governing High Flash High Speed Diesel as well. The claimed difference in flash characteristics and stated separate uses did not alter the classification position, because the notification covered Heading 2710 and did not specifically extend credit to the disputed product. The legal point is that a claimant must show specific inclusion for the exact product; a general distinction in properties is insufficient to overcome an exclusionary notification.

---

---

Issues: Whether High Flash High Speed Diesel (HFHSD) was eligible for Modvat credit notwithstanding the exclusion of High Speed Diesel (HSD) by Notification No. 5/94 dated 1-3-1994.

Analysis: The notification excluded HSD from the Modvat scheme, and the lower authorities had found that the distinction between high flash and low flash versions did not alter the classification position for admissibility of credit. The claimed difference in properties and separate uses of HFHSD did not persuade the Tribunal to depart from those findings, particularly when the notification covered Heading 2710 and did not specifically extend credit to the item in question.

Conclusion: HFHSD was not held eligible for Modvat credit and the issue was decided against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on merits because the exclusionary notification was treated as governing the disputed product.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a notification excludes a tariff heading from Modvat credit, a claimant must show a specific inclusion for the exact product; a merely asserted distinction in flash characteristics does not overcome the exclusion.

---