Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the export consignment was liable to confiscation and whether penalty was justified on account of overvaluation and understatement of quantity in the shipping bill.
Analysis: The declared FOB value was far above the local market price admitted by the exporter, and the declared quantity was also not correctly stated. The exporter failed to establish the correctness of the value declared in the shipping bill. On these facts, the export declaration was not truthful, and the goods were liable to confiscation. The person concerned was also liable to penal action for the incorrect declaration.
Conclusion: The goods were rightly held liable to confiscation and the penalty was justified.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed, and the Commissioner's order was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the declared export value is shown to be unrealistically inflated and the exporter cannot prove its correctness, the declaration is false and the goods become liable to confiscation with consequential penalty.