Appeal Dismissed for Non-Compliance with Pre-Deposit Requirement The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi due to the appellants' failure to comply with the statutory pre-deposit requirement ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal Dismissed for Non-Compliance with Pre-Deposit Requirement
The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi due to the appellants' failure to comply with the statutory pre-deposit requirement of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite having a financial arrangement with Revenue authorities, the appellants did not provide proof of pre-deposit.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance with the statutory pre-deposit requirement of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellants failed to provide proof of pre-deposit despite their financial arrangement with Revenue authorities.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.